Oh, what the hell. I really shouldn’t be doing this as I have actual work to do. CL Taylor (@cltaylor463) claimed to have disproven evolution several times. So I called him on it. He says
@BipedalTetrapod I just refuted your ignorant evolution-Athestic ideas in the past seven tweets
Okay then. Let’s have a look-see at the refutation, in reverse chronological order:
I have once again picked apart evolution!
Ya, ya, you said that. Butlet’s have a look
Adaptive radiation is a pipe dream develped by evolutions to justify a faulty assumption of evolution.
Um, no. Adaptive radiation is observable in the fossil record. Sorry, but “I say so” isn’t refutation.
All creatures are not perfect. Imperfections mean nothing evolution is flawed.
No. Evolution never EVER claimed creatures are perfect. Quite the opposite. Creationists do, however, so that’s a point for me.
Homology means that we have common traits with other animals but nothing more evolution is flawed
You share the same number of arms and legs and hands and feet with your siblings and cousins, yes? Are these genetic? Did you inherit those traits from a common grandparent? Or is it just chance that your whole family has the same number of fingers and toes? If these characteristics are genetic traits that are inherited from a common ancestor, then ALL organisms that share those traits inherited them from a common ancestor.
98% is not 100%.A chimp is not a human.Our DNA is so complex that we do not share a common ancestor.
Duh. If a chimp were human it wouldn’t be a chimp. DNA isn’t actually complex. It is very simple. Paired nucleotides strung together. It’s just that there are a shitload of pairs.
Life does not have a family tree evolutionist.We did not come from bacteria.
“because I say so” isn’t an argument. So, wrong.
It is impossible both mathematically&observingly for evolution to exist.
Whatever that means. Evolution is observable and has been observed (see http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-misconceptions.html#observe, http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html) and mathematics is used all the time in evolution.
Since radioactive dating is inaccurate,Evolution is based on unscientific&undocumented assumptions.
Radioactive dating is quite accurate. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-age-of-earth.html. Evolution is based on science, and always has been, whether you like it or not.
Evolutionist,still believe in the principle of superposition?
That recent strata are deposited on older strata? Duh.
Evolutionist-Calculations based on invalid assumptions always=invalid results
But calculations made repeatedly on assumptions that have been validated by umpteen different analyses from all walks of science tend to be valid. I would say, however, that Intelligent Design calculations, which are based on invalid assumptions, do lead to invalid results. So thanks for pointing that out.
There is no way for scientist to know the original amount of radioactivity in rocks when made.
Yes, there is, by looking at the quantity of the products of radioactive decay.
The earth’s rotation was stopped twice in Joshua10:13-14;II Kings20:9-11.
Gee, you got me there. Why, I must give up my atheistic evolutionist ways! No. Just kidding. Sorry, but it really wasn’t.
Only God could have designed cell differentiation so well. Random chance could not have done such.
Evolution is NOT about random chance. It is about iteration under selective pressure.
Evolution flaws-the uniqueness of DNA is so complex that it proves complex organism were made seperate&along side simple living things.
See the Chimp comment earlier. To which I will add that “It’s too complicated for me to understand so it must be false” is not a valid argument. I count 14, not 7 tweets. But anyway, let’s take a couple more:
@kaimatai It is not observable to believe in Evolution, b/c it denies the existance of God. God is the law and order in life.
So, what you are saying is, your faith is so shaky that it is threatened by actual observations of real events?
@kaimatai I find it very hypocritical that your lack of stable morality is lecturing me on your Postmodernism. Really? You are a fraud also
You want lack of stable morality? Research shows that the faithful have a wandering moral compass.